■ Direction You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of The quality of writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and the relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words. ■ Question Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
|
|
|
▶ Topic : Johannes Vermeer is famous for his masterpiece "Girl with a Pearl Earring"
|
|
|
▶ Your Answer : The reading and lecture are both about the three possible theories of Johannes Vermeer's painting model. The author in the reading passage postulates that the three possible theories are convincing to identify the authentic model of the "Girl with a Pearl Earring" painting. On the other hand, the lecturer casts doubt on the author's claims by saying that there are several drawbacks with regards to the theories.
First of all, the speaker argues that the theories delineates Maria Vermeer who was the eldest daughter of Johannes Vermeer and (갑자기 비동사 is가 나오면 문법에 맞지 않습니다. who is가 더 자연스러울 거 같네요.) the model of the original painting is not true. This is because the model could have been any other person since the painter usually paints everyday life scenes and ordinary people in 17th (th 꼭 써주셔야 합니다) century. Thus, he could have drawn some other models (단복수) such as maid etc. Therefore, it is hard to say that the model is the painter's eldest daughter specifically. This counters the reading passage's argument by saying that the model is the painter's eldest daughter because of his painting style.
Secondly, the lecturer points out that Magdalena Van Ruijven is not possible model of the Vermeer's famous painting. The daughter of his patron can not be the model of the painting because he often drew painting in a (전치사, 관사 필요) more symbolic style, which shows social status. Thus, (문장 부호 확인 필요) it is untrue to say that the model is the patron's only child. This is in stark opposition to the reading passage's claim that the model is Vermeer's patron's only daughter.
Last point made by lecturer asserts that the suggested tronie theory is not true because the tronie theory does not match with the painter's artistic style. Vermeer used to draw authentic subject he observed (시제 -> 과거) in person not a imaginary figure. Therefore, it is unlikely to be true that the tronie theory explains the authentic model of the painting.This refutes the reading passage's argument that tronie theory, which draws an (주어 동사 불일치, 모음 앞 관사 주의) imaginary figure instead of real model, (수식하는 구는 컴마 꼭 붙여주세요) can explain the true model of Vermeer's painting. |
|
1. 문장 구조가 이상한 경우가 많습니다.
컴마 특히 구분해서 잘 써주시고 한 문장 안에 동사 2개 오는 일 없게 주의해주세요.
2. reading and listening의 비율이 너무 listening쪽으로만 치우쳐져 있습니다.
비율은 5:5, 적어도 6:4 정도는 되어야 합니다.
이는 리딩에 대한 디테일 부족으로 이어지며, 분량 부족, 추가 설명 실패 등으로 이어질 수 있으니
리딩에서도 evidence를 많이 찾아서 써주시면 좋을 것 같습니다.
수고하셨습니다. *^^*