■ Direction You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of The quality of writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and the relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words. ■ Question Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
|
|
|
|
|
▶ Your Answer :
In the reading
passage, there is ample support for the author’s claim that coal, which is the
most significant source, (컴마를 써주셔야 합니다.)will continue to be utilized. However, the professor
in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author’s point.
To
begin with, the lecturer argues that mining coal requires a complicated process. The
reason is that there is not enough amount of the energy source because it is
being exhausted. Thus, people should dig deeper to reach coal. Therefore,
sophisticated pieces of equipment and procedures are needed. This opposes that the
reading passage’s claim that one benefit of mining coal is that people can find
it easily because of its close distance to the Earth surface.
On
top of that, the professor asserts that transferring is accompanied by separated
trips. It means that conveying costs a lot so the coal might be relatively more
expensive than other types of fuels. This casts doubts on the reading passage’s
claim that utilizing coal is cheaper to transmit compared to other fuels as
much money is spent on the safety of the other energy resources (단복수).
Finally,
the lecturer points out that the claim that coal provides people with more job
fields is not true. To be specific, currently people deal with many equipment and
machine to save money so the human requirement will be decreased. And, the working
place will be reduced as well. This refutes the reading passage’s claim that there are a lot of jobs which are related to coal, especially in the US.
|
|
27점이라는 점수는 문법에 문제가있기때문에 그렇게 주시는 건가요?? 기준이 뭔가요????
-
저는 점수를 드리지 않았어서 잘 모르겠지만 아마 문법 때문일 가능성이 큽니다. (통합형의 경우)
지금 제가 첨삭해드린 문법에도 오류가 없는 편은 아닙니다.
그리고 분량이 지금 짧은 편인데, state되어있는 evidence를 안 쓰셔서일 가능성도 존재합니다.
그리고 너무 listening에만 치우치지 마시고
reading에서도 문장을 많이 써주시면 좋을 거 같아요.
27점은 30점 만점에 27점입니다.
너무 상심 마시고, 피드백 받은 부분들을 계속적으로 수정해나가면
점수를 더 받으실 수 있을 거 같아요.
수고하셨습니다. *^^*