■ Direction You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of The quality of writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and the relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words. ■ Question Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
|
|
|
▶ Topic : Q: Korean chefs are divided over which direction Korean cuisine should take in the global marketplace. Traditionalists believe in maintaining traditional themes and methods. Reformists want to expeiment and fuse Koean food with other cuisines, to make Korean food more appealing internationally. Which direction do you think Korean chefs should take? Give specific details and examples to explain your answer.
|
|
|
▶ Your Answer :
Some people might say that original Korean traditional food is the most competitive by itself around the whole world without any alterations following the global trends. However, in my opinion, I firmly believe that Korean food needs to be hamonized with other foreign cuisines and lifestyles for the following two subsequent reasons. To begin with, Korean cuisines have to change their composition of ingredients. To be specific, foreign people have different appetites and are accustomed to their own food in comparison with Korean. For example, while I traveled to London by train, I saw a strange scene in the train. One child ate black laver without rice, which looked like eating snacks. Thus, I tried to eat the same laver by thinking original Korean types of laver. However, the laver was less salty and more crusty in order to make laver different types of snacks. It was clearly seen that Korean food is required to alter its cuisine methods to appeal to foreigners.
On top of that, Korean cuisines need to adapt different cultures and food styles. To explain, many people in overseas countries prefer to eat alone and choose their food according to their preference. For instance, there was a survey conducted by Korea University, with 300 foreigners as respondents. The purpose of the survey was to figure out what types of food they prefer to eat. What it found was astounding. Overwhelming 90% responded that they tended to go to cafeterias in which they could choose ingredients and vegetables due to their eating habits and their allergies. In addition, from the news media, one of the Korean stores succeeded owing to providing foreigners with a myriad of food selections, to make them being contended with their lifestyles.
To sum up, taking the affirmative benefits of adapting Korean food into consideration, it is worth changing the methods of cooking Korea cuisines. In this regard, I strongly support the advantages of reforming Korean food far outweigh its counterpart.
|
|
1. 각 문단 시작 전에 tab 버튼 눌러서 들여쓰기 해주세요.
2. 철자 오류가 잦은 편입니다. 심한 감점의 요인이 될 수 있으니, 에세이 작성을 마치시고 꼼꼼히 검토해주세요.
+) 단어를 외우실 때 스펠링을 집중적으로 외워주세요.
3. 첫 번째/두번째 바디가 전체적으로 비슷하게 느껴집니다.
foreigners' different styles and cultures 말고 다른 이유를 제시해주세요~!
수고하셨습니다. *^^*