It is often said that based upon thought of equality,
opportunity of education should be equal to everyone in spite of a doubt whether
it is actually effective or not (on its effect = considering
the “effectiveness” of an equal education sounds unnatural to me. It is
supposedly influential in many dimensions.). However, I firmly support
the idea that we had better give the intellectual chance to more potential
students in terms of happiness and attendance rate. (Chance
in terms of “attendance rate” does not make sense to me.)
To begin with, contrary to good students, higher
education bothers (prohibits) poor
students from living a happy-life. This is attributed to the fact that most of
them did not want to study advanced subjects even if (their)
intellectual knowledge tends to represent their power in society by
showing their ability to know various things especially in academic fields. (I can’t see what point you are trying to make here.) Thus,
forcing them to study more only make them get stressed out by worrying
about it. According to the Ministry of Education of Korea in 2009, there was a
huge difference between two groups of poor students in happiness index.
Students in group A were required to take advanced classes and those in group B
were limited to take basic courses during (for)
one month. The researchers showed that the level of happiness of the latter
group was much higher than that of the former group. Moreover, those in group A
had to constantly worry about finishing difficult assignments and reports. This
implies that the higher education is better restricted to good students. (It is better to restrict higher education only for excelling
students, you are saying?)
In addition, forcing poor students to get higher
education discourages them from attending every class. This is due to the fact
that taking these difficult courses can be useless because the poor student(s) are not ready to study and understand such
courses. When they feel these courses is (are)
worthless, they are not likely to attend class. According to a study conducted
by Seoul National University of Korea in 2009, the attendance rate of the
poor students who are forced to take advanced classes had decreased geometrically
(considerably = “increasing geometrically” is okay, but
“decreasing” so doesn’t, although mathematically possible) in direct
proportion to the level of the courses. The contributing factor was the
courses' difficulties in (by) which they
lose interests in studying them. This implies that as we expect easily, the
higher education is not appropriate for the poor students.
(Poor students – X / academically lagging
students, struggling students – O)