▶ Your Answer :On the debatable issue in evaluating the productivity of group study, the writer and the speaker respectively present contradictory viewpoints. While the author is an ardent proponent of studying in groups, the lecturer casts doubt on such argument based on students’ self-reports.
First, the reading passage mentions that studying in groups generally motivates students to study. The sense of belonging psychologically mitigates the difficulty of the task itself, further inspiring each team members to challenge their full potential. On the other hand, the instructor claims that students in the study groups lose their motivations, due to their colleagues’ lack of preparation and frequent absences.
On top of that, the author stresses that study groups enable students to learn more. Through the collective process of sharing resources and teaching others in different fields, students are more productive when studying in groups. However, the professor rebuts such assertion by arguing that students learn more when they study alone. Inclined to chat with each other, students will get distracted in study groups, consequently unable to fully cover what they need to during the group studying sessions.
Last but not least, in writer’s perspective, students in study groups save time since they will effectively divide workload among themselves. On the contrary, the speaker believes that students are more likely to waste unnecessary time when studying in groups. The whole process of gathering and walking up to the library consumes so much time and energy that could have been easily saved by choosing to study in solitude.
|