■ Direction You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of The quality of writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and the relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words. ■ Question Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
|
|
|
|
|
▶ Your Answer :
The reading
passage suggests why a new device could successfully determine whether a
person is lying. However, the lecturer argues that this new method also has same
problems that the conventional polygraphs have had.
First, she (문단이 바뀌었기 때문에 대명사 대신 the lecturer라고 칭해주셔야 합니다. 다른 문단들도 마찬가지입니다.) contends
that brain scan could misidentify true statements as lies. When people are being
required to answer about sensitive topics, their hesitation that how much information
they should share could activate same parts of brain that also activated when
they lie.
Next, she says
that even with results from the new method, disinterested judgement cannot be
made. The reading argues that since a brain scan produces object clues of lying. (since는 단독으로 쓰일 수 없습니다. 뒤에 연결구를 적어주세요.) But since people have different brain structures, it is impossible to measure it
with consistent criteria.
Finally,
she claims that a subject could trick a new machine easily by some methods. For
example, performing activities that require highly brain function could help a
subject conceal his false statements. Moreover, if a subject practices answering question wrongly repeatedly, his brain activity could not tell about his
credibility when he is tested. |
|
1. 부족한 문장력 때문에 어색한 부분이 많습니다.
최대한 깔끔하게 다듬는 연습이 필요해보입니다.
2. 전반적으로 디테일이 많이 부족한 상황입니다.
evidence를 최대한 많이 끌어내어 세부사항을 적어주세요.
수고하셨습니다. *^^*