■ Direction You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of The quality of writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and the relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words. ■ Question Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
|
|
|
|
|
▶ Your Answer : In the reading passage, the author explains that decreased readership on literature has negative impacts on both the mass culture and the later time for literature. The professor in the lecture suggests counter theories to the author's points. First, the professor contends that to maintain the intellectual ability, it does not have to be the literature. A myriad of other forms of books constitute the high quality of the contents and are imaginative as well, stirring reader's creativity. This casts doubt on the passage's claim that lowered readership on literature instigated the situation that people are losing the chances to gain informative advantages. Next, the professor argues that spending less time on reading literature are not associated with the lowered level of culture. Music and movies are have abundant of worth to be engaged in, telling us cultural value directly to the readers. This refutes the passage's suggestion that non-literature types of media consist of light meanings and low-quality of writing skills, harming the cultural status. Finally, the professor suggests that it is inappropriate to berate the readers. It is ascribable rather to the author to make the contents hard for readers to comprehend. If people in the early years have to look over the current pages, they would not get perplexed also. This counters the passage's assertion that it is regretful that less people are participate in literature activity in the era of excellent writers and it will diminish the production of literature due to the contemporary readership.
|
|
1. reading and listening의 비율이 너무 listening쪽으로만 치우쳐져 있습니다.
비율은 5:5, 적어도 6:4 정도는 되어야 합니다.
이는 리딩에 대한 디테일 부족으로 이어지며, 분량 부족, 추가 설명 실패 등으로 이어질 수 있으니
리딩에서도 evidence를 많이 찾아서 써주시면 좋을 것 같습니다.
(전체적으로 분량을 증량해주세요)
2. 문법에서는 필요없는 전치사들이 많이 보입니다.
전치사 용법을 정확히 숙지해주세요.
수고하셨습니다. *^^*