▶ Your Answer : Both the reading and the lecturer hold different positions, on an issue of work-at -home system. However, the lecturer's argument is formed around many points that are in direct contrast to the materials in the reading passage.
First of all, the reading passage points out that employees and the employees are able to benefit from the work-at-home system. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes this by insisting that when a company adopted the work-at-home, the productivity of employees in company had significantly plummeted. This is attributed to the fact that because no one mornitored them, the employees was easily being neglect, not being engrossed in their jobs. On top of that, the employers was not able to save much money and time they expected by adopting the work-at-home system.
Furthermore, the reading passage mentioned that employees can feel convenient when they work in their home. the lecturer counters the point in the reading by claiming that it makes them depressed. This is ascribed to the fact that it prevents them from having relationship and being interacted with thier colleagues excepting their families. Also, because their jobs and personal things are not compartmentalized but melted, they cannot easily find their time to break.
In conclusion, the reading passage presents three aspects with regards to the work-at-home system. However, the lecturer's assertion makes it clear that none of these characteristics justify the reading passage's claim.
세부사항이 2가지라서 예시에 최대한 많이 써보려고 노력 했습니다. |