▶ Your Answer :
The professor insists that playing video games is beneficial to children by (연구를 통해 주장을 한다는 뜻이므로 by라는 전치사가 필요합니다.) mentioning a research done. This contradicts the reading passage’s argument that video games have negatively impacts on young children.
First, the lecturer points out that (목적어가 단어가 아닌 다른 한 문장일 경우엔 that, which, who와 같은 접속사를 쓰시는게 좋습니다.) video games do not make children show obsessive tendencies. Actually, the symptoms of addiction can be seen in every activities activity (every뒤에는 단수형 명사가 와야합니다.) including watching a television, reading a books, and skiing. This offsets the reading’s argument that video games are so (so + 형용사 + that ~은 하나의 숙어입니다. 유용하게 쓰실수 있을거에요) addictive that it prevents students from having successful school lives. life. (students가 복수형이기에 lives가 되어야 하는게 맞습니다.)
Next, Second, (전 문장이 first로 시작되었기에 second가 더 알맞을것 같습니다.) the lecturer says that video games work as a safety belt rather than stimulate stimulating (than 다음엔 문장이 아닌 구절이 와야하므로 동명사인 stimulating이 적합한 표현입니다.) students’ aggressive tendency. Only a few bad apples showed seriously violent behaviors, but most of them used the game as a tool to for release releasing their stress. This refutes the reading passage’s claim that the more the students play video games, the more they get aggressive.
Finally, the speaker says states that playing games gives (주어는 games가 아닌 playing games이기에 단수형입니다.) positive influences to students. To be more specific, students become more intelligent than before because they learn how to solve problems and do multi tasks at one time. This allowed them to improve their social skills and make fast decisions in their everyday daily life as well. too. This overrides the passage’s argument that playing game is just a waste of time.
|