▶ Your Answer :
The lecturer argues that it is worthwile (worth는 명사입니다. 형용사인 worthwhile을 써주세요) to learn instrumental music because it helps students have more full and balanced education. This point of view contrasts sharply with the reading passage’s claim that instrumental music has no worth to learn.
First of all, the lecturer suggests that instrumental music helps students learn other subjects, like mathematics and languages. In order to learn instrumental music, students have to be accustomed to read abstract musical notation. Thus, students can raise abstract thinking skills. In the end, they can solve math problems better by using abstract thinking skills. Also, Moreover, (also로 문장을 시작하는건 좋지 않은 선택입니다.) students can raise their language skills by learning different sounds of instrumental music. This goes against the claim in the reading passage that learning instrumental music bothers learning other subjects.
Secondly, the lecturer states that there is a way to learn instrumental music in an economical manner. He suggests that schools can look for volunteer teacher for free. Also, In addition, they can have cheap musical instrument by promoting donations or purchasing in low prices. This refutes the reading passage’s claim that learning instrumental music is too costly.
Finally, the lecturer contends that instrumental music can enrich students’ school life even though they are not talented. They can express themselves using musical instrument. Also, On top of that, some students do not (seem의 부정이므로 do not을 앞에 붙여주시면 됩니다.) seem not to be talented at first, but chances are that they can grow up to be an expert. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim that it is unnecessary for all students to learn instrumental music because not all students are talented. |