■ Direction You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of The quality of writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and the relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words. ■ Question Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
|
|
|
|
|
▶ Your Answer :
The lecturer contends that sucralose is not as hazard as it is described (지문이기 때문입니다.) in the reading passage. Although the reading passage claims that sucralose causes serious problems regarding people’s health, the lecturer strongly asserts that the substance is unlikely to create those issues.
First, the lecturer mentions that diabetes should not be attributed to consuming sucralose. A lot of other ingredients such as rice and potatoes also increase insulin in the body, but they are not blamed as the cause of diabetes. Moreover, the experiment showing that people who drink diet soda are prone to have diabetes is not reliable, because those people are commonly overweight and this physical condition leads them to develop diabetes. This refutes the reading passage’s claim that people who consume sucralose tend to develop diabetes.
Secondly, the lecturer asserts that sucralose does not emit toxic compounds if it is dealt with in the real life. The environment of the experiment related to the correlation between the toxic substances emitted from sucralose and cancer is not similar with that of the real life. Rather, the temperature in which the researchers cook sucralose was higher than the heat we normally cook at (전치사). This counters the reading passage’s claim that when sucralose is heated, it creates toxic chemicals that cause the serious health problems such as cancer.
Lastly, the lecturer says that the effect of sucralose in terms of allergic reactions is not plausible. The anecdotal witnesses that some people who experienced allergic symptoms are not credible, because it is more likely that they are just affected by some people taking about allergic reactions in the media. No severe allergic symptoms are resulted from sucralose that any other type of food. This cast doubts on the reading passage’s claim that the sucralose is a substance that is not properly processed by human’s body and that is (줄임말을 지양해주세요.) why it creates some allergic reactions among some people. |
|
1. 각 문단 시작 전에 tab 버튼 눌러서 들여쓰기 해주세요.
2. reading and listening의 비율이 너무 listening쪽으로만 치우쳐져 있습니다.
비율은 5:5, 적어도 6:4 정도는 되어야 합니다.
이는 리딩에 대한 디테일 부족으로 이어지며, 분량 부족, 추가 설명 실패 등으로 이어질 수 있으니
리딩에서도 evidence를 많이 찾아서 써주시면 좋을 것 같습니다.
3. 문법은 대체적으로 깔끔한 편입니다.
수고하셨습니다. *^^*