▶ Your Answer :
In the lecture, the lecturer asserts that congestion pricing is not advantageous as some people might expect it to be. This contrasts the reading passage’s claim that implementing a system of charges imposed on vehicles during peak times will reap benefits.
First, the lecturer contends that congestion pricing is likely to lead to more severe accidents. This is because reduced traffics due to congestion pricing result in higher speed of driving. According to a report to determine whether there is a correlation between speed and accident severity, increase in speed by 30% will double the risk of serious injuries. This cast doubts on the reading passage’s claim that congestion pricing makes diving much safer.
Secondly, the lecturer maintains that this system will make public transportation less convenient in the long term. More and more people will use public transportation, which lead to excess of capacity for riders. This will make riders discomfort. Also It will be much more difficult to catch a bus. This contradicts the reading passage’s claim that congestion pricing system makes public transportation more convenient.
Finally, the lecturer argues that congestion pricing does not match with reality. He says that a lot of retail businesses will decline revenue since shoppers are reluctant to come into city due to the charging system. According to a survey, most of the retailers blame it for economical damage. This refutes reading passage’s claim that congestion pricing system has a positive effect on businesses.
format에 맞게 아주 잘 작성해주셧습니다. 내용도 참 좋고, 문장도 잘 이어질 수 있도록 생각하셔서 작성한 듯 싶습니다. 어휘도 최대한 다양하게 (argue/claim등등) 쓰려고 하는 점은 보였는데, 그럼에도 반복되는 부분이 눈에 조금 띄여서 아쉬웠습니다 어휘 더 다양하게 쓸 수 있도록 해주세요 |