In this set of materials, the writer and the lecturer cover the issue of the impact of jogging to human body. The writer listes three reasons of the idea that jogging is harmful to the human body. However, the writer lecturer contradicts the reading passage's claims by matching rebutting evidences.
To begin with, while the writer argues that jogging is bad for heart, (reason?) the lecturer actually points out that this is just an exceptional case, and this doesn't matter to the average people. In addition, many doctors have recommaded recommend jogging, and they believe that jogging is rather benificial to heart and can prevent heart problems.
On top of that, the lecturer casts doubt on the reading passage's claims that jogging puts extremly extreme pressure on the ankles and hip joints. His main reason is that this is because people don't work out regulary, also he states that if people exercise regulary, people are able to have more mighty joints.
Futhermore, the lecturer denies the reading passage which maintains that jogging disturbs brain cell production, by saying that this is just a rumor. also, he say says that jogging is an attractive way fot students to improve academic achievement in class becuase jogging improves the memory.
|