The reading passage argues that students’ evaluation system regarding teachers is an effective way to improve education quality. However, the speaker contradicts that reading with opposing views follow as.
To begin with, while reading passage says that students are proper position to judge teachers since they are actual receiver of teacher's service, speaker point out that those students basically are not good subjects as a judge because they tend to evaluate teachers by popularity not quality with the biased and emotional criterion. For instance, the students who have low score at exams, they are much possible to act based on their emotional thinking.
On top of that, the speaker casts doubt on the reading that the students are consumers who entitled to expressing about how the education service is. His main reason is that the concept of consumer is not applied to education part which extremely different with what is used in business market.
Furthermore, the speaker denies the reading which maintains that the assessment by students is not only able to be reflected for teacher promotions and salary increase also, let teacher know exactly how their education quality is by saying that the assessment is not significant factor affecting the promotion and salary increase. Additionally, most of teacher and administrator are likely to ignore about the outcome from the assessment.
For these reasons, the speaker challenges the reading’s points about advantages of the assessment of teacher by students.
|