▶ Your Answer :According to the listneing, the lecturer alleges that three hypothesises about why Mayans were wpied out are not reliable.
Firstly, the speaker says that Mayans did not died out due to other tribe's invasion. This is because there are conspicuous proofs that a tribe, Toltec, who are thought they attacked Mayans, had no military systems.This goes against the reading passage's claim that invasion of other tribes casued Mayans to be disappeared.
Secondly, the lecturer insists that Mayans did not disappeared due to abrupt increase of population which occured a lack of food, since, farmers offer abubdant amount of crops to citizens and there were enough knowlegement about agriculture and how to cultivate crops. This contradicts to the reading passage's assertion that Mayans were extincted due to a sudden mounted populations in Mayan society.
Thirdly, the professor mentions that long-terms of drought did not have fatal effects on Mayan culture.This is because it was Northern area which suffered severe drought, however, some archiologists assert that it was southern region where collapsed firstly. Thus, it is not sufficient evidence to prove that long-lasting arid weather made all Mayans to be wiped out. This goes against the reading passage's argument that long-lasting serious drought made Mayans to die out.
==================================================================
Some people says that it is better to use commodities which made in other countries; however, thinking that is ridiculous, i firmly believe that even if prices are high, buying own nation's products is better than not. This is because, by doing so, not only in case of equipment's malfunction, it is easy to get compensations, but also we can mount our countrie's economical status.
To begin with, when we use commodities wich made in our country, we can have immediate responds from companies that made those goods. Putting it differently, if people buy products which produced in far located nations, it is hard for people to get proper compensations form those nations. A stoty of my friend will be the best example to support my opinion. I have a friend who had an equipment which made in America. However, one day, his equipment was broke down and he tried to get any responds from America, but he couldn't, since the distance between the United states and Korea is too far. As a result, nowadays, he prefers to utilize products made in Korea.
In addition, by consuming our country's commodities, we can help nation's economical status to be increased. In other words, if we do not buy our nation's products, it will has negative effects on our nation's financial status and this also affects on our lives. According to the survey conducted by Tokyo University, 87% of nations' financial status was increased compare to other nations. This is because, in those countries, their citizens are willing to use commodities which made in their own country. Even one of people in those countries said that it is good for people to consum their country's products, since it will has positive effects on our lives as well as nation.
In a nutshell, it is manifest that using all kinds goods regardless of where they came from, enables us to live affluent lives. However, in terms of quick repairs, in case of malfunction and increasing our nation's economical status, consuming products made in our country brings more benefits.
시험장 가서 글쓸때 tap키눌러서 들여쓰기 해야하나요??
해야한다면 어디어디 해야하나요?? |