All smokers disagree (overstatement) with the government policy of the smoking prohibition in public spaces such as bus stations, office builds and public toilets. That’s because they believe a total ban on many public places is to invade is an invasion to their the private life. However, in my point of view, this rule is necessary to protect the people’s health from indirect smoking and maintain the environment of the country.
First of all, the policy to prevent from the smoking in public spaces is effective to damage the non-smoking people.정책이 non-smoker damaging에 효과적인가요? :) Commonly, people think that people with non-smoking don’t get any damages from the smoking of other people.(another overstatement,
any->much) Unlike this public notion, the harm by indirect smoking also creates serious health diseases like lung cancer. The Korea times cited about the damage by indirect smoking that the rate of having lung cancer of non-smoking person affected by smoking is 5 times compared the non-smoking person without any influence by smoking. Therefore, the policy is plays significant role of protecting the people’s health.
In addition, the prohibition policy of human’s smoking in public places is helpful to clean the county’s clean environment. Smoking people are likely to pitch cigarette butt on the street. Therefore, this tendency makes the country’s street be dirty. Let’s see Korea. (inappropriate expresssion) Before 5years 5 years ago, smoking is was available in any places. However, now smokers cannot smoke in every public places. As a result, now our country’s environment cleaning level is much improved than before.
이해를 돕는 예시가 아닌 단순한 주장의 반복으로 보입니다 :)
In brief, the rule of smoking ban in public places is many advantages. Especially, it is effective to maintain the country people to fit physically and also this policy is good way to increase the clean level. Therefore, I firmly believe that this rule should be enforced. |