The reading passage argues that the homeschooling has much more advantages than the traditional school. However, in the lecture, professor claims that the reading passage's assert can be wrong by listhing rebutting proofs.
To begin with, according to the article, it says that going to a school is a waste of time because it prevents a child form spending their time efficiently. If the child would be in home, they don't have to spend their time to breaks between classes and time to move. However, the professor rebuts the passage's opinion. He says that going to school makes a child keep their time more efficiently by organized class time and due date for reporting, which also helps the children to get up early and spend their time flexible in their home.
On top of that, the article also says that a child who go to school would be likely to stray their line. In other words, they can be attracted by a bad children in school. So, it argues that homeschooling would prevent a child from going to bad sides. On the other hand, the lecturer claims that homeschooling can hinder a child's social activities with their peer because there are no opportunity to keep in touch with many freinds and teachers in the home. So, the professor asserts that it would be hinder a rasing of child's social skills.
Lastly, the reading passage asserts that homeschooling is helpful that parents spend time with their children since homeschooling offers the parents flexible and suitable time to spend with their children. However, the lecturer argues that it is not realistic and frustrate their children. |