The professor contradicts the reading’s passage that hydrogen energy is not pass test.
Firstly, the lecturer asserts that hydrogen energy cost higher than gasoline energy. Hydrogen energy should be used with electro energy. This assertion directly contradicts the reading’s claim that hydrogen energy would be much economical than nonrenewable fossil fuels.
Secondly, the lecturer explains that hydrogen energy is not easy to store. The liquid form of hydrogen energy is volatile and the making process is difficult task. Also, the weather is not feasible for making the hydrogen energy all the time. This explanation directly refutes the reading’s argument that hydrogen energy is eco-friendly and environmentally friendly.
Thirdly, the lecturer insists that store the hydrogen energy is not easy because the form of storing the energy is quite heavy. This insistence directly contradicts the reading’s claim that the hydrogen energy is effortless to keep and transport.
In conclusion, the listening passage states that
결론은 리스닝에서 언급이 없었는데 써야할까여? 글자수 땜에 써야한다는 압박잉 ㅜㅠㅠㅜ