It is often said that the government has to invest money in practical research rather than every parts of science research. Some people may oppose this statement because after all every parts of science is very helpful. However, in my opinion, the government has to invest money in pragmatic areas of science. This is because we do not have to squander the amount of money, and we can strengthen the efficiency of research.
To begin with, if we invest money in practical research ,we do not need to waste money, and we are less likely to dissipate the country's money. For example, when I was an elementary school, Korea suffered from IMF. The time was very hard to korea people. So, the Korean government had to save amount of money. For this reason, the korean government had to invest intensive research of science such as definite plans and indispensable subjects. After all, the korean government can save a lot of money. And then, a lot of countries such as japan and china imitated korea's strategy. It indicates that intensive investment is very useful to save a lot of money.
In addition, we can increase efficiency of science research. According to the Ministry of Science of Korea in 2007, they announced that practical investment was good choice rather than all parts of the investment. They experienced the difference of investment in their works. Fist, they invested in money all parts of science. But, it is not good to increase the effectiveness of investment. Secondly, they invested in money essential areas if science. As a result, it is an advantage to strengthen profits. Studies have indicated that practical investment is useful to increase effectiveness.
To sum up, though everyone may hold a different position in this issue, I am in favor of my idea that investments in practical areas cannot compare with every parts of science research. The main reasons are that we can strengthen the effectiveness, and save a lot of money
|