▶ Your Answer :
The lecturer argues that the evidence about dog’s domestication is not convincing. This contradicts the reading passage’s claim that the by using excavations, people can figure out the detail of the dog’s taming. First, the lecturer contends that the theory that (that 반복적으로 적지 말고 theory of dog evolving-이런식으로 나가는 게 더 깔끔했을 거 같습니다)dogs evolved from wolves don’t have the clear evidence. To be specific, ancient people had difficult time to hunt because of archaic equipment, so they could not trap the wolves easily. Also, the nature of the wolves is very aggressive, so it was too dangerous to capture and tame them. This refutes the reading passage’s claim that the dogs’ ancestors were the wolves that are tamed by people. Second, the lecturer asserts that the dogs were domesticated far before the 16,000 years ago. The archaeologists have figured out several traces about this. This counters the reading passage’s claim that roughly 16,000 years ago, dogs were lived with the people by measuring the differences in DNA. Finally, the lecturer maintains that the clues of the dogs’ domestication are founding multiple places of the world. Other ancient civilizations also tamed the dogs, a lot of diggings supported this fact. Also, recent DNA researches show that the today’s dogs have 4 distinct ancestors. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim that dogs were tamed by Chinese and spread to all around the world.
문장적/문법적인 오류가 많이 나오는 편입니다. 기본적인 시제, 수일치 오류 특히 신경써서 proof reading해야 합니다. listening 에 대한 detail이 많이 부족한 단락 있습니다. 적어도 4문장 정도는 나올 수 있도록 적으면 주장 이해가 더 빠를 것 같습니다. |