> > 2010-07-12 22:47:11, '' 님이 쓰신 글입니다. ↓
■ Direction You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. You response will be judge on the basis of The quality of writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and the relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words. ■ Question Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
| |
|
|
|
In this set of materials, the writer and the lecturer cover the issue of "universial risk-taking personlity"
The reading passage contends that people with this type of personality engage in risky activities in all aspects of their lives. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points that contradict this arguement by matching rebutting evidences.
First, the speker argues that they do not face danger because they are skillful and have positive mind. This casts doubt on the reading, which states that their behaviors must be considered illogical and pathological.
Second, according to the lecturer, they have rewards which are physical, chemical and psychological pleasure. This refutes the reading passage's assertion that people who endanger their lives and the lives of others for no reason except for the satisfaction they get from their selfish thrill-seeking.
| |
처음해보는거라 두 가지 예밖에 못받아적었습니다 ㅠㅠ그래도괜찮나요?? 그리고 마무리는 주로 어떻게 지어야하죠?
템플릿에 그런 부분은 없어서.......
In this set of materials, the writer and the lecturer covers the issue of "universial (spelling error) universal risk-taking personlity personality"
The reading passage contends that people with this type of personality engage in risky activities in all aspects of their lives. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points that contradict this arguement argument by matching rebutting evidences.
First, the speker speaker argues that they do not face danger because they are skillful and have positive mind. This casts doubt on the reading, which states that their behaviors must be considered illogical and pathological.
Second, according to the lecturer, they have rewards which are physical, chemical and psychological pleasure. This refutes the reading passage's assertion that people who endanger their lives and the lives of others for no reason except for the satisfaction they get from their selfish thrill-seeking.