▶ Your Answer :
The lecturer argues that the brain scanning
technique is unreliable because of some severe errors. This contradicts reading
passage’s claim that it is evolved form of lie detector which was used before
the scanning.
First, the lecturer contends that this one
is not better. Because it is not possible to stimulate the same parts of brain
during complex thinking like interview. Also there is an evidence that person
can easily determine what to reveal and what to show in the research. This cast
doubt on the reading passage’s claim that scanning can reduce the possibility
of errors caused by stress and it can eliminate the result based on anxiety.
Next, the lecturer claims that the
statement that scanning is objective is plainly wrong. Considering that each
parts of brains differs from others, so experts should be hired to interpret
the result. Also it can diminish the probable errors by using expert in
research. This counter the reading passage’s claim that judgement used before
canning was subjective because human errors are consequently caused in
interpretation and actual image is innovative in terms of this.
Finally, the lecturer asserts that there
are other methods preventing the trick. For example, because complex mental and
all parts of brain should be used in sophisticated activity like answering the
question, they can’t deceive the researchers. This refuter the reading
passage’s claim that brain activity analysis is reliable than using drugs to
control heart rate.
점수: 22 리딩에 대한 정보가 많이 부족한 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요하게 보는 것 중에 하나는 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우에 있어서는 리딩에 대한 부분을 한 문장으로만 서술하였는데. 한 문장만 서술하고 리스닝에 대한 부분은 구체적으로 서술하는 것 보다는 리스닝을 좀 더 반박할 수 있는 부분들을 더 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다.
|