■ Direction You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of The quality of writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and the relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words. ■ Question Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
|
|
|
|
|
▶ Your Answer :
In the reading passage there is ample support for the author’s claim that three rational causes of red rain. However, the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author’s point.
First, the professor contends that red rain is not relevant with to bats blood. According to experts, five millions of bats have to die to emerge in rain. However, near the Kerala kerala, none of the wings and bones were found. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim that rain could be related with to bats blood because during the migration time lot of bats demolished by the storm. Next, the professor insists insist that red rain accounts for the volcanic eruption does have not proven. Red rain was only happened in Kerala kerala. However, If this rain was caused by the volcano, all the other cities would have occurred occur the same phenomena. This counters the reading passage’s suggestion that red rain was caused by the dust, from a volcanic eruption, mixed with clouds and low ph level of this mixture fall with red color.
Finally, the professor argues that factory chemicals are not a factor for red rain. In Kerala kerala, there are only a few factories and not a lot of chemicals are made. If this theory were true, other big cities should have the same weather phenomenon. This refutes the reading passage’s assertion that chemical which emitted from factory compound with air, resulted in red rain.
|
|
문법 오류에 유의해주세요. 문법 실수가 많으면 고득점을 절대 받을 수 없습니다! 문법을 점검해주세요.
수고하셨습니다 :)