▶ Your Answer :
In the reading passage, there is ample support for the author's claim that there exist a plethora of severe problems in fish farms. However, the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author's point. First, the professor contends that the dissemination of sea lice can be solved realistically. People are nowadays using specific fish species which can remove the sea lice. In detail, they are cleaner fish, and only one of them can get rid of fifty sea lice, which is a powerful solution for this issue. This casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that the restricted area of fish farms provokes the spread of the lice, some of which can move to the wild sea. Next, the professor argues that the drawback of overusing marine resources can be overcome by numerous methods. It is true that this problem existed in the past due to obsolete feeding systems by which fish in the farms were fed once a day. As a result, their fodder fell to the ocean floor. However, people succeeded to reduce the amount of meals they eat by making use of more efficient feeding systems. Furthermore, people are currently utilizing plant-based materials to provide the fish with protein. This counters the reading passage's assertion that a significant amount of living creatures in the ocean such as squid should be exploited in order to raise fish which are being grown in fish farms, which results in running out of marine resources. Finally, the professor insists that an opinion that escaping captive fish give rise to the demolition of marine ecosystems is not true. Even though fish can swim free to the outside of the farms, this problem can be handled by using a diversity of apparatus. For example, human-made ponds on land make the fish unable to escape to the sea and devastate the marine ecosystems. Therefore, the cultivation of fish in the farms is safe. This refutes the reading passage's suggestion that escaping fish are capable of destroying the ecosystem, since they might outcompete indigenous species.
그냥 professor라고 하지 말고 from reading인지 listening인지 적어줘야 합니다. 화자가 누군지 모르면 주장 비교가 제대로 안 됩니다. listening에 대한 detail이 아주 잘 나온 것 같아요. reading도 주장 설명 적절하게 잘 되어서, 두 주장 간의 balance잘 맞는 편입니다. 어휘만 더 다양하게 쓸 수 있도록 하면 좋을 것 같아요. 나머지는 다 좋습니다. 실전에서도 이렇게 detail쓸 수 있다면 좋은 결과 있을 것 같습니다 |