▶ Your Answer : It is debatable whether the government should decrease budget spending on art. It is intriguing topic because opinions concerning this issue are very different relying on the individual perspectives. In my opinion, however, I support that the government should decrease investing to art for the following reasons. First of all, art is not necessary in our life. Art cannot give meal and make money. It is just entertainment. When we have free time, we can enjoy entertainment. However, if we cannot solve a problem related to sleeping, eating, clothing, it would be uncomfortable to live in the world. For example, beggars may need food, clothing and shelter. Do you think they can enjoy pictures in the museum? It is difficult to live a day. They always fight with starving and cold, so they have no room for enjoy art. Therefore, this proves that the government should invest to public transit, parks and so on. In addition, art cannot be developed by the money. It can be progressed by people. In the art, if people do not attend, it cannot be formed. The art is consist of people's individual perspectives. In my experience, I made paintings with my friends. We drew pictures cooperatively, so we could made it. If I tried to draw pictures, it must have been impossible because it was very difficult to draw a lot of pictures. By gathering our ideas and effort, we succeeded to make our art. In conclusion, I firmly believe that if budget deficit occurs, the government should decrease its spending on art. All things considered, it is my belief that my argument regarding this topic has been precisely and efficiently delivered with the reasons mentioned above. Never should we forget that this issue may have a huge impact on our future.
우선 주장에 대한 detail이 조금은 부족해보입니다. 주장에 대한 설명이 더 자세하게 나왔다면 훨씬 설득력있게 다가왔을 것 같아요. 그리고 질문 같은 경우에는 introduction에 쓰는 게 훨씬 좋을 거 같습니다 main paragraph에서는 내가 읽는 사람을 설득한다, 느낌으로 차분하게 적어야합니다 어휘가 많이 기본적인 편입니다. 동의어 함께 외우는 거 정말 중요하고 다른 사람들이 글 어떻게 썼는지 여러번 체크하고 따라 써 보는 것 좋습니다 |