▶ Your Answer :
According to the reading, there is ample
support for the author's claim that genetically modified (GM) crops have some
advantages. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points that
contradict this argument. to contradict this argument.
First, the professor insists that GM crops hardly solve world hunger. Even though the food
supply is already enough more than its needs to support needs, unequal distribution of food
makes the poor hunger. GM crops would be offered by the same way as
conventional ones. This casts doubt on the reading passage's suggestion that GM
crops can alleviate the problem of global hunger.
Nest, the professor argues that the cost of
GM crops would be high would become increased. Developing seeds of GM crops and raising them are is (ing뒤에서는 항상 단수 동사 입니다) costly processes because these take a lot of efforts, expertise, and resources
such as water. It is untrue that GM foods stabilize the food supply and lower
the price of food. This refutes the reading passage's claim that GM crops lead
to food prices decreasing. to decrease in food prices
Finally, the professor contends that
vaccines from GM crops easily spoil as much as
traditional ones. be spoiled They require a cool condition to keep and transport
appropriately. This limitation prevents the vaccines from worldwide use. This
counters the reading passage's assertion that the availability of vaccines from
GM crops is widespread.
점수: 22 리딩에 대한 정보가 많이 부족합니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우에 있어서는 리딩에 대한 부분을 각 단락에서 한 문장으로만 서술하엿는데. 한 문장으로 끝내는 것 보다는 리스닝을 좀 더 반박할 수 있는 부분들을 더 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셧습니다.
|