▶ Your Answer :
In
the lecture, the professor casts doubt on the reading passage`s idea that archaeologists
trusted that locale of ancient a lot of treasure was written on a rusting copper
scroll for a time, but they do not believe it is fact now. The professor
asserts that there were change their thinking that the treasures really exist.
First
and foremost, the professor argues that the ancient scroll`s vague is natural. According
to the reading, description of the scroll is not specific and detailed, thus, they
do not find treasures` location. In opposition in this argument, the professor says
that no one writes concretely the location of prized treasures, which makes
treasures be safe, therefore, the scroll`s uncertainty is reasonable.
On
top of that, the professor states that archaeologists` assumption was false in
the interpretation. The reading passage describes that there are a number of golds
and silvers that more exist than in the world. On the contrary, the professor claims
that, when they exactly decipher the scroll, it is possible for the metals to
exist truly.
Lastly,
the professor debuts the reading passage`s point that there were no important discoveries
regarding real Copper Scroll treasures, by revealing some faults in this
interpretation. The professor points out that excavation of treasures was happened
until now. For example, in Egypt, archaeologists uncovered a relic written on
the ancient scroll, and it proved the scroll is real. |