▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage contends that there are some issues with using tamarisk beetle as a method to eradicate the tamarisk tree, which consumes an excessive amount of water in the arid region. On the other hand, the lecture brings up several points that contradict this argument. to contradict this argument.
First, the speaker argues that the spread of the tamarisk beetle can be controlled. This is because the The (this is because는 적절한 표현이 아닙니다) beetles only survive in areas where the tamarisk tree exists as it is their only food source. Moreover, there are several natural predators for the beetles, which control their population under check. controlling the population. This casts doubt on the author’s point that it is impossible to control the invasion of the insect, and thus the use of it to kill the tamarisk tree is not a good idea.
Second, according to the lecture, the use of the insect to eliminate a tamarisk tree has an immediate impact. This is supported by the fact that the The (this is supported~같은 표현은 적절치가 않습니다) beetle limits the photosynthesis of the tree by consuming the tree’s leaves. Since photosynthesis is a process that requires the drainage of water from the ground, the decreased rate of it will deter the tree from extracting large quantities of water. This counters the reading’s assertion that the utilization of the beetle is an ineffective method as it takes too much time to kill the tree.
The final point made by the lecture is that the increased risk of wildfires by the usage of the tamarisk beetle is not so severe. The reason is that the local government which has a lot of experiences of controlling wildfire will take appropriate measures. For instance, the flammable debris on the ground can be removed or the practice of controlled burning can be utilized. This refutes the reading’s claim that the use of tamarisk beetle to get rid of the tamarisk tree is not the best solution as it has a high risk of wildfires.
점수: 23 리딩에 대한 정보가 많이 부족한 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우에 있어서는 리딩에 대한 부분이 각 단락에서 한 문장으로만 서술하였는데. 한 문장으로 끝내는 것 보다는 리스닝을 좀 더 반박할 수 있는 부분들을 더 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다. |