The reading passage and lecture are both about single-stream recycling. The reading passage contends that single-stream recycling has some problems. On the other hand, the lecturer believes the problems are not that bad.
First, the lecturer argues that single-stream recycling would not be dangerous. This is because the cart could be parked properly when people follow instruction marked clearly with a little education. Therefore, it would not roll into the street and create traffic hazard. This goes against the reading passage's idea that the one large cart with all sort of recyclables could roll into the road and cause traffic issues.
Second, the lecturer points out single-stream recycling does not decrease available recycling materials. This is due to the fact that gathered recyclables by the recycling are more than loss of contaminated materials. In addition, only one percent of recyclables could be damaged in single-stream recycling, so people could get more recyclable materials by the recycling. This casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that single-stream recycling causes (주어 동사 불일치) drop of recyclable materials by contaminating the materials.
The final point by the lecturer is that single-stream recycling would not be costly. The reason is that collecting cost could be reduced, so this would cut down the overall expense despite additional cost such as sorting laboring cost. As a result, single-stream recycling would be effective on reducing cost in a (관사 필요합니다) long run. This rebuts the reading passage's view that single-stream recycling requires more money to sort the collecting recyclable materials so that the cost would increase.
1. 각 문단 시작 전에 tab 버튼 눌러서 들여쓰기 해주세요.
2. reading and listening의 비율이 너무 listening쪽으로만 치우쳐져 있습니다.
비율은 5:5, 적어도 6:4 정도는 되어야 합니다.
이는 리딩에 대한 디테일 부족으로 이어지며, 분량 부족, 추가 설명 실패 등으로 이어질 수 있으니
리딩에서도 evidence를 많이 찾아서 써주시면 좋을 것 같습니다.
3. 문법은 대체적으로 깔끔한 편입니다.
수고하셨습니다. *^^*