▶ Your Answer :
There might be some people who believe that
building a social house near their community has only disadvantages. However, I
personally disagree with the above idea for two subsequent reasons. Firstly,
regional economy grows up. Secondly, government builds good facilities in their
community.
First, communities that have the social
house grow up. To be specific, people in need come to the social house. They
need jobs and want to work for (전치사 필요합니다) anything. Also, their wage is cheaper than that of (비교 대상 확실하게 만들어주세요) a (관사 필요합니다) normal
person. What this means is that the communities could use them by low price.
Let me bring up my community as an example. When I was in high school, our
community had a lot of factories (복수). However, factories could not work since most of the community’s members were (단복수) old people. It made our community depressed. This
situation was changed because of a social house. Government built the social
house in our community and a lot of people came to our community. As a result,
the factories worked again thanks to worker from the social house and regional
economy grew up.
Second, government will build good
facilities near the social house. This is because people who (관계대명사) lived in the social
house need various things such as general hospitals, a library and national
parks. These facilities are also good to a local resident. Let me bring up my
community as an example again. After the social house was built, the government
also built library and university’s hospital. Since I was in high school, I
needed a (올바른 관사) quiet place where I could study SAT. So, I went to the library and
studied SAT every day. If government had not built the social house, I could not have (문장 성분 위치) studied SAT in the library.
In conclusion, building social houses helps (주어 동사 불일치) regional economy and government also can build good facilities for people. In this
regard, I strongly agree with the statement that it is beneficial to the
community that government build a social house. |