▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage contends that the US government should provide
subsidies to farmers which as a result allows them to have a lot of advantages.
On the other hands, the lecturer brings up several points that contradict the
reading passage’s claim.
First of all, the lecturer argues that assistance for farmers does
not stabilize the food supply. Actually, they have nothing to do with increasing
food production. For example, the US government had made payments for bio-fuel
which is an alternative energy, but the overall outcome did not increase. On the
contrary, this counters the reading passage’s claim that agriculture has a lot
of variation like a weather change, the government should encourage farmers to
grow additional crops in order not to lose them.
Second, the lecturer asserts that subsidies lead to increasing
the price of food. To be specific, most of the farmers grow crops such as
corn, wheat, soy and so on because these kinds of crops are subsidized by the
government. Therefore, there is a small portion of fruits and vegetables which are not subsidized. As a result, the price of the vegetables and fruits goes up.
However, this refutes the reading passage’s claim that subsidies would lower
the price of food because they still have a profit.( have a profit은 무슨 뜻인가요? make a profit뜻으로 쓰신건가요?) By providing this economic
assistance for farmers, we could buy crops with reasonable prices.
Finally, the lecturer maintains that subsidies do not help (who?) economically. To illustrates, the farmers will not hire workers. They just
would purchase more equipment. Moreover, the owners to farm would get a benefit.
Thus, rural communities would not experience economic growth with
subsidies. In contrast, this casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim that
special payments to farmers facilitate economic health in rural areas where there
are few job opportunities. If the farmers cultivate more lands with subsidies,
more workers would be needed and this leads to the economic growth of this region.
주장이 그렇게 clear하지는 않는 것 같습니다 주장에 logic이 더 있다면 훨씬 좋을 거 같아요 (+supporting detail들도 더 자세하게 작성할 수 있도록 도와주세요) 어휘도 조금은 기본적인 어휘 위주로 작성되는 것 같아 표현력은 조금 아쉬운 편입니다,,조금 더 다양하게 동의어 위주로 공부해주세요. conclusion은 없는건가요? summarize 조금만 쓰셔도 좋으니 써주세요
|