▶ Your Answer : The reading passage is of the position that
there are several solutions to put a damper on birds from injuries. The
lecturer, in stark contrast, strongly disagrees with this and rebuts each
points mentioned in the reading.
First and foremost, it is stated in the
reading that one solution is to replace the regular, clear glass with one-way the glass that is transparent in the only direction. The speaker, on the other hand,
highlights that it triggers serious issues when people replace those windows with
one way glasses. Those materials generally reflect the scenery from outside and
birds actually don't understand the concept of the mirror. Therefore, they
might confuse the reflected sky or trees as real.
Second, the reading passage claims that a
second solution is to paint colorful lines or other designs on regular window
glass. However, the professor contends that put lines with color could not be a
perfect way to be on the wane the problem. By those lines on the window, birds can think it as a hole on the building and fly toward it. To deal with this
problem they should reduce the size of windows on the building.
Finally, the article says that the third
solution is to create an artificial magnetic field to guide birds away from
buildings. The professor counters this view by providing additional details
that it is not true that the magnetic field helps birds from collapsing of
buildings. They generally make use of magnetic field to navigate their ways in
long migration. Thus, it is not need in short distance flying such as moving
across the building in an urban area. The brightness actually affects in their
short traveling.
To wrap up, the professor refutes the solution mentioned in the reading in combination with 3 main reasons.
좋은데 article이 reading인지 listening인지 적어줘야해요. 그리고 professor은 from reading인지 어휘가 약간은 아쉬워요. 조금만 더 다양하게 쓸 수 있을 거 같은데 아쉽습니다. 이거보다 listening이 더 길어야할 거 같아요. 조금 더 자세하게 설명하고, reading은 짧게 적는 것이 좋습니다 그리고 conclusion은 적지 않아도 돼요 |