▶ Your Answer :
The lecturer argues that gases, dust, and solar flare are inadequate explanations for the cause of TLPs. This contradicts the reading passage's claim that these hypotheses are plausible. To begin with, the lecturer insists that gases are not relevant to TLPs. He delineates that the occurrence of TLPs near the craters is just a coincidence due to the abundant presence of craters on the moon. Also, the amount of gas emission detected is not accurately known. Together, these facts counter the reading passage's assertion of TLPs created as a result of gas emission from the moon's craters. Secondly, the speaker disagrees that TLPs happen due to dust floating, mentioning that there is no supporting evidence for this theory. In order to be visible on Earth, dust storms should be large enough. In fact, there has been no actual indication of such tremendous dust storms available to result in TLPs. This attenuates the reading passage's idea that TLPs are the consequences of the interaction between light and dust aloft. Finally, the lecturer addresses that there are insufficient data to substantiate the solar flare hypothesis. When the dates of TLPs occurrence and those of solar flares are compared, it was hard to find the correlation between them and the records rarely matched. This once again refutes the reading passage's argument that solar radiation is associated with the TLPs.
예상 점수 평가 부탁 드립니다. |