▶ Your Answer :
The lecturer argues that congestion pricing does not have any benefits. This contradicts the reading passage’s claim that congestion pricing give benefits to our lives. First, the professor speaks that it can make bring about/cause a dangerous traffic situation. To be specific, There is there are many cars which speed up for regulation. (Clarify the meaning) So high-speed cars are more likely to make a traffic accident. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim that charge system (What is it?) at peak-time makes safer traffic system. Second, the speaker mentions that public transport is actually not can not convenient. For example, many people will use pubic transport because of for charging system. So there will be a many public vehicles, which might cause. It can make a traffic disorder. This refutes the reading passage’s claim that public transport will be more convenient. Finally, the lecturer says that it (What is 'it?) can not make a good local business. To be specific, this charging system limits transport supply. (How?) So it can make less business. (Unclear point) This counters the reading passage’s claim that business will increase for congestion pricing. In summary, The points in the lecturer counter the reading passage. The professor demonstrates that the charging system at peak time is not efficient. Therefore we can say that the passage fails to describe charging price at busy time.
채점기준표 | Grammar | Contents | Example | Coherence | 점수 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | Score | Limited 10-17 |
- 'many cars 가 speed up 한다??' 뜻하고자하는 바를 명확하게 밝혀주세요.
- charge system이란 무엇인가요?
- 왜 charging system이 사람들로 하여금 대중교통을 더 이용하도록 만드나요? - 각 단락의 첫 번째 문장은 모두 full name으로 언급하여 주세요. - 세 번째 business 내용은 설명이 많이 부족해보입니다. |
|