▶ Your Answer :
The
reading passage contends that there are primary
primarily three advantages regarding congestion pricing. On the other
hand, the lecturer brings up several points that contradict this argument.
First,
the lecturer claims that congestion pricing is not advantagous advantageous to road drivers. This is because the
reduction of traffic does is not
necessarily related to the decrease in traffic accidents
since people are likely to drive at higher speeds
when there is less traffic. To be specific, according to the a recent study, when the speed of cars increase by thirty percent, the rate of serious injuries or
deaths also surges. This counters the reading passage's claim that congestion pricing will lead to safer driving.
Next,
the lecturer insists that public transportation will be less convenient. more unconvient. This is because of
the fact that the number of people who are taking the public
transportation will increase due to the congestion pricing. The more people use
the public transportation system, the more longer
the time they will have to wait to use
it. Therefore, people will feel unconvient less
convenient. This casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that
congestion pricing will result in the more
convenient transportation.
The final point made by the lecturer is that congestion pricing negatively
affects businesses, especilly especially retail businesses. To be specific,
congestion pricing will be a burden for small retail shops, whereas it is not
that big problem for large companies. As a result, it is not good for local businesses. (Why
will it be a big problem for retail shops?) This refutes the writer's
claim that it has will have a positive
effect on businesses.
Writing
0-30 Score Scale |
Fair (17-23) |
Score |
20 |
Overall
Comment: |
Good. 두 입장을 잘
비교하셨지만, 문법 오류 및 철자 오류가 많아서 감점을 드렸습니다. 철자 오류는 글을 다 작성하신 이후에 글을 한 번 더 확인하시는 습관을
가지시는 걸 추천 드려요. 또한 마지막 문단에 왜 retail shops에 안 좋은지 설명하시는 게 좋을 것 같습니다. |
|
|