▶ Topic :
In
the reading passage there is ample support for the author's claims that there are several
methods to prevent The emerald ash borer from destroying the north America
trees.
However, the professor in the lecture gives
several reasons as a rebuttal to the author's point.
First,
the professor contends that people couldn't immediately figure out which trees are find infected trees just until
after 1~2 years later when they infected trees. And To explain, only an urban area can be
effective to applied to this method since appropriate distance, most of the forest
in the north America cannot be applied for this method. (What does it mean?)
This casts doubt on the reading passage's
claim that removing the infected trees can stop the emerald ash borer from
spreading.
Next,
the professor insists that a chemical treatment will result in groundwater
contamination. (State explanation)
This counters the reading passage's
assertion that insecticides will be able to stop the adult borers from laying
their eggs and exterminates their larvae that are already present.
Finally,
the professor argues that biological pest control does not seem effective since survival wasps depends on regions. however, the Northern America is
inhospitable in winter for them because of the cold condition. In addition,
they consumes different sorts of insects. (what point are you arguing?)
This refutes the reading passage's
suggestion that parasitic wasps in Asia kill borer larvae. and releasing more
of these wasps into the wild should considerably decline the number of them.
채점기준표
|
Grammar
|
Contents
|
Example
|
Coherence
|
점수
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
Score
|
Limited 10-13
|
전체적으로 각 point들이 서로 정확히 반박하지 못하고 있습니다. 어떤 포인트를 설명하고 있는지 추측하기 어렵습니다. 무엇보다도 그래머에서는 since를 독립적으로 사용하지 않습니다. 또한 There is/ there are , impacted trees 반복사용하지 않도록 합니다.
|
|