▶ Your Answer : In the given set of information, both the reading passage and the lecture deal with violence in video game. The lecturer casts doubt on the author's assertion that video games has negative effects , by presenting three compelling counterarguments. First of all, according to the reading , playing of violent video games increase aggressive behavior. However, the lecturer refutes that the passage by stating that the author claim is disputable. To be specific, sales of violent video games have increased but the amount of violence school has decreased. Next, the lecturer claims that rewarding about acts of violence can sufficiently validate video games is harmful to players. The lecturer indicates that the author's claim is not convincing. This is because video games require complex social interaction ,such as teamworks. That is, video games render social skills for people. Finally, the speaker also disagrees with the reading's final point that young children doesn't know the difference between game life and real life. She argues that experts argues that 7 years old children fully understand between fantasy and what is reality. Therefore, the theories from the reading passage all have drawbacks |