The lecturer disagrees with the reading passage’s claim on the reasons why TLPs, the transient lunar phenomena, (쉼표) occur by presenting three counterarguments.
서론에서는 1. 두 passage가 공통으로 다루는 소재가 무엇인지가 나와야 하고, 2. 각 passage의 입장 및 서로 관계가 어떤지(lecture가 reading passage를 반박한다는 등)가 드러나야 합니다. 이 서론에서는 transient lunar phenomena가 무엇인지 설명이 부족하고, 각 passage의 입장도 충분히 드러나지 않습니다. (“reading passage는 세 가지 가능성을 제시하지만, lecture는 이를 각각 반박한다.”)
First, the lecturer argues that as the craters are abundant on the moon’s surface, gases leaked out are gas leak is coincidently observed where the craters locate. (이 서술은 reading의 주장인 “gas가 유출되어서 TLP를 일으킨다”를 반박하지 못합니다. lecture의 논리를 충분하게 설명해주세요.) Moreover, the amount of gas emitted, which are claimed by the reading passage to be the cause of TLP, is not detected in fact. appeared as TLPs cannot be detected. This counters the reading passage’s claim that gases beneath the surfaces of the moon expel gas clouds that appears as bright hues and the gas emission can be measured. (논리가 제대로 성립하려면 1. reading passage의 주장이 무엇인지가 먼저 드러나고 2. 그것을 반박하는 lecture의 논리가 설명되어야 합니다.)
Second, the lecturer contends that dust clouds are not large enough to appear as illuminated clouds. Also, only the evidence of small dust particles is provided the only evidence provided is of small dust particles and but not the storms of dust on the moon’s surface. This contradicts the reading passage’s claim that TLPs are light reflected off the suspended dust.
Lastly, the lecturer claims that there are insufficient data to support the theory that magnetic storms illuminate portions (?) that appear as TLPs. This is because the date of solar flare is not correlated with the date of magnetic storms. (이 두 날짜가 다르다는 사실이 reading의 주장을 어떻게 반박하는지?) This rebuffs the reading passage’s claim that magnetic storms on the sun’s surface release radiation that appear as TLPs.
Writing 0-30 scale
Fair (20-22)
전반적으로 lecture가 reading을 어떻게 반박하는지가 불분명한 부분이 많습니다. 이를 위해서는 1. reading의 주장이 무엇인지? 2. 그것을 lecture는 어떻게 반박하는지?가 충분히 설명되어야 합니다.