▶ Your Answer :
Some people insist that governments develop computer technology. On the other hand, some people require that government spend their money on more basic needs. Both of them have their own benefits, I strongly agree with the statement that governments should invest their computer technology. There are two reasons why I believe money have to be spend on developing technology: we want ourselves to live conveniently and we need the staple industry to improve their own economic and social system.
First of all, the technology has an important role in our society. In other words, we live in high-technology society. For example, we can quickly get lots of information we want and communicate with others no matter where I am and where they are. Likewise, we can transmit huge amount of mails to other nations’ people in a second. The technology makes us live in convenient lives. In addition, people do not need basic things such as house, food and clothes; because these essential things already exist in our society. Consequently, most people are prone to pursue the convenience, not basic needs: we apparently know that modern people cannot live without computer, which make our lives more fast and convenient.
Furthermore, the governments need some powerful industries of the nations. The nations operate their social and economic system by developing industries. The selected industries can make a huge of money to nations. Additionally, the industries can have a tremendous influence on their people: they give people jobs and opportunities to earn money. This process also applies to the computer technology. Because the demands of computer have increased around the world, the nations choosing computer industry can be the rich, and they also have their people fulfill their basic needs. Consequently, the nations could catch two rabbits by throwing one pebble.
Of course, to satisfy peoples’ basic needs also have its own merits. However, in my opinion, I strongly believe that the pros of developing or buying the technology far outweigh the advantages of fulfilling basic needs; therefore, I would choose the former. |