▶ Your Answer :
The lecturer argues that music classes are essential(,) because those will help to offer in the aspect that they provide balanced education. This contradicts the writer's claim that these classes are unnecessary.
To begin with, the lecturer suggests that music classes are highly helpful in learning other subjects. Music notes are abstract symbols, which is similar to fraction in math(.) 그래서 뭐 어떻다는거죠? 수학을 이해하는데 도움이 된다, 혹은 수학의 어려운 개념들에 익숙해질 수 있다 등등 결과가 나와야겠죠? Moreover, learning to distinguish minute differences can be a of great help in learning spoken language. (어떤 면에서 도움을 줄 수 있다는 것이죠? ) This counters the writer's claim that music classes are not practical at all(,) and it is just reducing time to study mathematics and language.
In addition, the lecturer points out that schools are thinking of ways to save money in music classes. Recruiting volunteer teachers is a good example. Besides, they are making strenuous efforts to find/get people to donate or sell the musical instruments in low price. This refutes the writer's claim that music classes are much too costly. (why?reading 에서 제시하는 이유가 있을 것 같군요..)
Lastly, the lecturer insists that music classes offer students a great sense of reward. Learning music enriches their lives. (어떠한 면에서 enriched their lives 하다는 건가요? 삶의 질을 높여주나요? 돈을 많이 벌게 해주나요??) On top of that, some students might not seem to be talented at first, but they can get inspired later and be a renowned musician. This casts doubt on the writer's claim that most students are likely to acquire far less return compared to the efforts they have made.
보충하실 내용이 많습니다. 구체적인 서술 부탁드립니다. 수고하셨습니다~ |