Primarily We put dialogue on the Fists Place.
In history, we experienced a lot of war. Most of them is were
caused by a conflict between country countries. <과거에 있었던 일이기 때문에, 과거형으로 만들어주시고요, 문제가 나라들 사이에 있었던
것이기 때문에, 복수형으로 쓰셔야 합니다 ^^> Greed
which each country had induced great war.
However, picture is changing. Inner states' conflict, such as political or
culture issues, most of all, whether one read Bible or Coran, bring about
civil war. Although, this kind of conflict have existed in all history. but
However, alas, followed by interconnected
world, and technological advance, This
conflict spreads to another country, which makes
results to the larger turbulence beyond the nation's
ability to deal with this conflict alone.
After 9/11, diplomat and politicians manage this
kind of conflict with military intervention. Sadly, the this super power actually didn't do any good at coping with this violence. The innocent vetteran veterans have had been
killed more than they expected since 2004 when
J.W.Bush declared win victory in Afganistan
Afghanistan. Then, what's the problem? they
didn't intend to talk to anybody who make up of their own society, and
make tranquil state-it seemed-be full of turbulence-no matter who taleban
regimn or radical islmist or victim of the civil war. <이 쪽 부분이
이해가 안 됩니다.
확인해주세요> As a
result, they didn't know what Afghans want but
know what G.I. joe wants.
Before engaging in war, we should have talked to
those people who dwell in. Of course, unless
supported by all diplomats on earth we can rarely talked to those people. We,
so, have to dialouge talk to their groops
representate group representative their
each about each other’s value
or interests. If conflict within one country is caused by other interest or value on many issues embraced by other groops
groups that they
have, it's-talking to that specific social
groops groups is just common sense. To
sum up, we need more profound talk not with only regimn regime but with regimn regime, including those other groups that they have.
To jump in to the profound talk, We should
embrace different value and put labeling terrorist aside for a while. Based on this, we became natural, showing them our
will to have profound dialouges conversation with them. Second, in diplomatic world,
we have frequently overlooked the victim of authoritarianism. Our important partners are just the dictators who
brutalize their citizens who pursue democratic right. We should turn our eyes into those citizens, based on dialouge
dialogue with the dictators. Lastly, we should
embrace other crucial issues, such as climate change, religious divide, as
well as tranditional traditional diplomatic
issues.
이게 토플용인지는 잘 모르겠지만, 너무 말들이 복잡한 것 같습니다~ 좀
더 생각을 정리하시고 쓰시면 더 좋을 것 같네요. 토픽도 좋고, 쓰신
이유도 괜찮은 것 같습니다. 수고하세요~
|