▶ Your Answer :
There is a controversy between the speaker and the writer as to whether wind power energy is reasonable or not. The lecturer argues that it is a still good alternative energy. It goes against writer's opinion that it is not beneficial.
To begin with, the lecturer argues that the number of birds which were killed by blade of the wind plant is could be negligible compared to human's other activity. Therefore, using a wind energy is better way to save animals. This explanation directly opposes the writer's claim that its blade is killing numerous numbers of birds. 좀 더 구체적으로 상반되는 아이디어를 쓰시면 더 좋을 것 같습니다. 상대적으로 reading 의 입장을 충분히 서술되지가 않았습니다.
On top of that, the lecturer asserts that today's wind power plant is much more silent than before. After redesigning, it become became more beautiful and less noisy productive. This explanation casts doubt on the writer's argument that it is too noisy and it does not provides not good image. 이번에도 reading 의 입장은 충분히 설명이 안되었습니다. 구체적으로 써주세요.
Lastly, the lecturer maintains that it can be built in everywhere regardless of hight height of place. Therefore, it is much more productive. Also, initially consumed money to build wind plant would be earned back in three months. <consumed는 형용사이기 때문에, 앞에 나온 initial은 부사로 바꾸셔야 합니다> This contradicts the writer's assertion that it is not reasonable as building a plant in high place is money demanding.
대조되는 포인트는 잘 catch 하셨지만 문제는 구체적인 설명이 부족합니다. 이 점 기억하시면서 연습하시면 좋을 것 같습니다~ |