▶ Your Answer :
It is evident that, in our current society, public transportation has tremendous importance in our lives. Some people think that people should not have to pay to use public transportation, while others do not. I, however, believe that people should pay to use public transportation. There are several reasons that I could discuss to support my argument, so I will limit to the two that I feel are the most relevant to the topic.
First of all, when it comes to high-quality service, people should pay to use public transportations. If people do not pay for it using transportations, the government should manage the transportation system with insufficient budget or we should pay more tax for it. In a sense, it is true that we may be happy to use our transportations for free. But, soon, we cannot satisfy with the quality of transportations. According to the survey which is conducted by Seoul Metro in 2000's, people's satisfaction satisfying with the service quality of subway has been grown by 10 percent from 70 percents to 80 percents, even though fees have been increased 7 percent for decade with the 7 percents increasing of the fee during 10 years. (어떤 뉘앙스를 전달하고자 하셨는지에 따라서 문장이 조금 바뀔 수 있겠습니다. 7퍼센트의 요금 인상이 있었음에도 불구하고 만족도는 높아졌다 라는 말이 앞 부분에 서술하셨던 문장들 – 사람들은 공짜로 이용하기를 좋아할 것이다. 그러나 quality 에 대해서는 만족하지 못할 것이다- 과 관련된 조사결과라고 했는데요~ 이걸 설명하고 싶으셨다면 요금이 내려가면서 사람들의 만족도가 내려갔다는 결과를 보여줘야하는 것 아닐까요? 반면 자신의 주장인 이용요금을 내야한다 라는 주장을 뒷받침해주고 싶었다면 충분한 설명히 필요할 것 같습니다. 제가 길~게 설명했는데요, 결과적으로 연결이 자연스럽지 못하다는 말을 하고 싶었습니다~ ^^) In addition, actually, with augment of fee could offer better quality service serve more services including sufficient air-conditioning, new facilities and so on to customers. Where there is comfort, there should be money.
Another reason for my thinking this way is that people can have responsibility on public facilities by paying through paying to use transportations. Paying for using something makes people more careful when they deal that subject or facilities. This applies to in a variety of different but relevant situations. A good comparison to illustrate my point would be books in public library and those in private library or own homes. Most of books in public library, most of them are torn (out), painted or even lost. But no one makes dirty her or his own book which they bought (with their money). This same situation applies to use transportation. As this comparison shows, government of companies (?) ought to impose public transportation fees lay a fee on using the transportation.
All things considered, with the reasons I mentioned above, I believe that I have sufficiently and adequately explained my position on the matters regarding this topic.
내용의 보충이 필요합니다. 구체적인 예시를 제시하시거나 객관적인 자료를 정확하고 분명하게 그리고 자세하게 서술하시도록 조금만 더 노력하시면 더 나은 결과를 얻으실 수 있을 것 같습니다. 수고하셨습니다~ |