This is a controvery on whether the writer’s points on why people sleep are correct or not. First, the writer explicates the reasons why people need sleep, In response, the lecturer argues that points made in the passage are inaccurate and inconclusive.
First of all, it is the lecturer’s opinion that sleep has not been proven to improve people’s memory functions. She contends that despite the presence of some experiments that might appear to suggest the validity of sleep helping one’s ability to memorize, there is too much contradictory evidence to affirm so. She also mentions that REM sleep is not essential to gaining good memory after sleep. This counters the writer’s opinion that sleep does improve people’s memory functions, as proven in experiments testing the dependence of memory on the amount of sleep one gets.
Also, the lecturer asserts that sleep does not help to conserve energy, and in fact may perform exactly the opposite, as one cannot consume any food while sleeping. She goes on to say that the only conclusive fact is that sleep makes people use less energy than when awake. This is in contrast to the passage, in which the writer opines that an individual has more energy upon awaking from sleep. To corroborate, he mentions that sleep allows a person’s body to conserve energy and allow it to repair itself at the same time.
Lastly, the lecturer believes that sleep does not flush everyone’s body of harmful toxins, adding that the amount of toxins absorbed differs from person to person. She also says that experiments relating to the theory are inconclusive, as participants were placed in extreme conditions that starkly differed from the normal pattern of sleeping. On the contrary, the writer is confident that the human body, especially the brain, is largely rid of harmful toxins in the duration of sleep, and that this helps one think more clearly.
통합형 치곤 너무 길다고 생각되는데 어떻게 하면 분량을 알맞게 줄일 수 있을지에 대한 조언도 부탁드립니다..