▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage contends that the digital library is beneficial in various aspects.
On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points that contradict this argument.
First, the speaker argues that it is not easy to access digital libraries for the poor. He says that there are many people who have no internet connection/ who cannot access the internet in the world the world is still lack of access computer. In other words works, many houses even do does not have computer. Therefore, more number of people lose their chance to read a book if they should use digital library the access of books would be narrowed if they use digital library. This casts doubt on the reading which states that the digital library allowed people to easily access to books. (reading 에서 제시하는 근거도 써주셔야 합니다~)
Second, according to the lecturer, digital libraries do does not guarantee that people can save saving time. That’s because too much information is on the internet, so it’s hard to believe the contents. (앞문장에 대한 이유를 설명하는 두 번째 문장에서 전혀 상관없는 이야기가 나오네요. time saving 과는 상관없이 believe contents 인데요. 제대로 맞게 써주세요~) He says that it would take more time to check whether the reference is correct. This point refutes the reading passage’s assertion that using of digital library helps people save is good in view of saving time. (다시 한번 말씀드립니다~ reading passage 에서 말하는 근거도 써주세요~)
The final point made by lecturer is that intellectual problem would be increased. That’s because intellectual property could be serious problem. Many people would use the resource without paying for it not pay the money and use resource, so the authors would not destruct morale to publish books at online anymore. This fact counters the writer’s claim that digital libraries would make one’s intellect intellectual would become property. (왜 reading 에서 그렇게 말하는 지 이유를 써주세요)
전반적으로 reading 의 입장을 설명하는 내용이 적습니다. 균형을 이룰 수 있도록 양 쪽 입장을 적절하게 서술해주시면 좋을 것 같습니다. 수고하셨습니다~ |