▶ Your Answer :
An intriguing topic of discussion at hand is whether government should focus more on preserving nature and less on the economic development. The answer to this question can vary greatly, depending on the individual perspectives. Thus, the jury may still be out, but as far as I am concerned, I agree with the statement. In this essay, I will present two reasons supporting my standpoint as follows.
To begin with, our environment is severely polluted by people. In detail, releasing of CO2 from the economic development makes greenhouse effect to the earth. According to a report recently released in 2012 by the Seoul National University, discharging CO2 is main problem of environmental contamination. The study found that the ozone layer had decreased compare to the past 10 years. Although the economic development was the best choice of government in the past, nature problem is more important than that in nowadays. As a result, this leads to the following logic: government had made unbalanced development, which had led critical pollution to the nature. In this sense, it is evident that the present is the period that we have to adjust the environmental pollution.
Moreover, the nature is indispensable part to the human being. In particular, the nature is more close to people than economy. I have experienced this on many occasions, but the most notable example is as follows: I learned about the environment when I was in high school. The teacher said that the nature is the most near existence to human. Also, he taught to student that if the nature has destroyed by people, it will be a biggest sin to our son or daughter. As with teacher said, preserving nature is very important than other developments. Therefore, this lends itself to the following logic: the nature which is the part of people’s beginning and ending together must be preserved by people. In this respect, it is apparent that protecting the nature should be the first step than the economic development.
In conclusion, I strongly argue for my standpoint on account of the two reasons mentioned above. Once again, although the verdict may still be out, I personally believe that two of my rationales above are sufficiently convincing enough to represent the viewpoints of a majority of people who are in favor of my claim. |