Both the lecture and the reading hold different positions, respectively, on the issue of getting early in the morning. The lecture’s argument is formed around many points that are in direct contrast to the material in the reading passage.
First, the professor points out that it is unhealthy to rise up early since people need to sleep for enough hours per day. The professor also notes that if people lack sleeping time, they are more likely to get sick. This directly contradicts the claim in the reading that just getting up earlier allows people to take advantages of improved quality of life.
Second, the professor also argues that some people are unable to function well in the morning because of their natural rhythms. According to the professor, people, whose biorhydms are unsuitable for getting early in the morning, would feel groggy and tired if they wake up early. This argument by the professor refutes the claim by the reading that getting up early serves fewer interruptions, thereby providing people with more productive time to concentrate better.
In conclusion, the reading passage presents two aspects with regards to rising early. However, the professor’s argument makes it clear that none of these characteristics justify the reading passage’s claim.
멋 모르고 일단 써 봤습니다..ㅋㅋㅋㅋ
조언 남겨주시고 귀담아 듣을게요 :)!