=> There has been an argument whether making social or political view known to students in class is beneficial or not. Although the jury is still out, I strongly believe that informing social or political ideas of students is not valuable. The rationale behind this is that students will be received this point conformingly. Moreover, class is not appropriate place where students debate freely.
First of all, announcing social or political point has a negative impact on their idea.
To elaborate this, students are not mature mentally yet; therefor, they follow teacher's thought without skeptical idea. For example, last year, In a class, my teacher claim that recent president is awful. After that, every students in my class agree with him because he suggests that very logically and we don't have enough information about that. For this reason, I agree with the idea that suggesting personal idea about social problem.
Secondly, class is not appropriate place where students debate their ideas freely. To satisfy this, class is face-face tutorial. It means that they don't protect their privacy and secrete. In other words, students are afraid of reputing teacher's point because it might be harmful their grade; therefore, debating only one direction will deprive students of the right talking freely. Thus, I agree with the notion that arguing political view in class will be banned.
All things considered, debating social or political view in class lead students to harm their personal view. On account of the reasons that I mentioned above: not only lead the situation that students follow teacher's view conformingly but also deprive young people of the right for speaking whatever they want.
|