There are two ways for a company to spend money; on stimulating artists to produce thier completion or on eliminating pollutants from the environment. Although most people think that it is neccessary for the company to invest their money in preserving the environment since it has much to do with people's lives, I belive that spending money on supporting the arts is more an effetive way to inform people of its fame and the government has already made an effort to protect the environment. I will explain my idea by presenting two reasons as follows.
First, today's many companies give money to some artists to get a recognition from people. In the past, many companies struggled to be noticed and they had a tendency to help the poor. However, now, people enjoy their leisure time appreciating arts because they do not need to worry about money thanks to the increased quality of life. For this tendency, company uses the strategy supporting arts which most people consider to be noble and link their reputation with arts supported by them.
Secondly, there have already been many solutions to protect the environment by the government. Even if a company spends their money on preventing the environment from being contaminated, It will costs a lot because the environment problem cannot be easily solved. In order for it to get recovery entirely, the company has to set a long strategy that requires much their effort and money. If the project is not success, their invest will be vain and cannot get any recognition from people.
In conclusion, as I have already mentioned above, it is better for a company to give money to help artists produce good results in that they take few risks and be noticed for their contribution to the society more easily. |