▶ Your Answer :
The lecturer describes work-at-home is ineffective(,) because workers might be unable to concentrate on their work, feel depressed, mix works and home problems. such as not concentrating on their work, feeling depression, and mixing works and home problems. This contradicts the reading passage’s claim that work-at-home is good for employers and employee.
First, the lecturer argues drawbacks of employer. Employees who work in their home waste time in doing their task to do other things because nobody monitors them. In addition, the money spent for work-at-home is wasted is much bigger than for real estate money on work-at-home is much bigger than spending money on real estate. However, the reading passage contradicts it by claiming that employers can save their money because they don’t need to pay money for place space, and 1. employees’ productive increases because they work in comfortable environment.
1. 근로자가 생산하는 데 드는 비용을 증가시켰다는 것인가요? 다시 표현해보면 좋을 것 같네요.
Second, the lecturer argues drawbacks of employee. If employees don’t meet other co-workers, they can feel isolated and become depressed. Furthermore, workers cannot think home and work separately since they are staying at home while they are working because employees don’t commute, they can’t separate their mental to work and home. For this reason, melting all things it affects to employees’ productivity and concentration which make them produce lower quality and less number of output of work and then their productivity is lowered. However, the reading passage casts doubt on that. Employees can build (their) stronger family membership and use enough time to improve do self-development. In addition, because employees don’t commute to company, they can take up enough time for themselves, and they can use their mental and physical energy to improve their productivity.
|